David Campanelli leans into the mic at the Beet.TV AI Media Summit, eyes narrowing. “The biggest thing that’s missing in terms of CTV as a performance channel is measurement,” he says, flat out. Crowd nods. But here’s the kicker—CTV performance measurement? Still demands that clumsy ‘extra step’ from screen glare to actual consumer click.
Zoom out. Horizon Media’s president of global investment isn’t mincing words. AI’s everywhere in adtech now—DSPs, SSPs, social feeds—quietly juicing campaigns without the fanfare. Yet CTV clings to its branding roots, pretending it’s ready for direct-response glory. Spoiler: it’s not.
Campanelli’s blunt. AI’s embedded deep, driving optimizations we barely acknowledge. But big TV? That path from couch exposure to checkout cart feels like sending a carrier pigeon.
Why Does CTV Measurement Still Lag So Hard?
Think about it. Phone ad hits your pocket—tap, buy, done. Laptop banner? Same vibe. CTV? You’re bridging living room pixels to some probabilistic hellscape of signals. Campanelli nails it:
“It is still an extra step to take the exposure on a TV screen to an action that someone’s taking. It’s a lot more direct when it is a message to your phone, an action on your phone.”
Direct quote, unfiltered. No sugarcoating. Horizon’s Blu platform—fancy name for their AI toolkit—sharpens audience targeting, sure. Precision targeting leads to backend wins, he claims. But that screen-to-action chasm? Yawns wide open.
And don’t get me started on the branding hangover. Big screens scream awareness, not conversion. Refining measurement for short-term lifts or long-haul loyalty? That’s the grind adtech’s dodging, like it did with web cookies back in 2010. History rhymes—remember when we chased clickthrough rates as gospel, ignoring real sales attribution? CTV’s replaying that script, hyping reach while fumbling ROI.
Short version: CTV’s performance dreams crash on measurement rocks. Always will, unless someone mandates cross-device graphs (spoiler: privacy says no).
AI’s no savior here, either. It’s polishing edges, not rebuilding the house.
Is AI Just Hype for Creative Scaling?
Campanelli pushes back hard on AI eating creativity. “We don’t believe in AI as a replacement for the creative process,” he insists. Enhancement, scaling—think churning out thousands of ad variants for one-to-one targeting. Humans dream it up; bots remix.
Sounds tidy. But let’s call the spin. Ad agencies love this narrative—keeps creatives employed while tech bros claim the wins. Truth? AI’s supercharging lazy scaling, not genius. Pump out variants? Great for A/B hell. But that spark, the human weirdness that sticks? Bots mimic, don’t invent.
HorizonOS bundles it all—data partners, tech stacks—for end-to-end magic. Audience dev to activation. Fine. Yet Campanelli admits AI’s under-discussed impact on current optimizations. Why? Fear of admitting machines already run the show?
Dry laugh. We’re in consolidation mode anyway. M&A’s pruning the field—fewer buyers, sellers. Paramount eyeing Warner Bros. Discovery scraps? Soon, platform-scale buys like Meta or Google. Traditional nets fade; walled gardens rise.
“What that leads to is really large scale platform buying and having traditional operators sell more on a platform basis instead of individual networks. We’re going to have fewer competitors and more scale with each one.”
Campanelli again, prescient. But scale without measurement? Just bigger black boxes.
My hot take—and this one’s fresh, not in the transcripts: CTV’s ‘extra step’ mirrors radio’s 1940s ad slump. Golden age of programming, zero sales lift proof. Brands poured cash, chased vanity metrics. Sound familiar? Bold prediction: without radical attribution overhauls—like blockchain-verified paths—CTV plateaus as premium branding, not performance king. AI tweaks won’t bridge it. History whispers; execs ignore.
Look, Horizon’s ahead—Blu, HorizonOS, AI embeds. Campanelli’s realistic amid summit cheerleading. But industry’s AI obsession blinds it to CTV’s core flaw. Performance channel? Dream on. Extra step stays extra.
Platforms consolidate, sure. Fewer players mean muscle. Yet measurement mess persists, capping upside.
Skeptical? Damn right. Adtech’s CTV fairy tale needs a reality check.
What Happens When Platforms Go Full Walled Garden?
Campanelli sees the merger wave cresting. Sides thinning—buyers, sellers alike. Result? Mega-platform deals. Trad media apes Big Tech: sell inventory en masse, not piecemeal.
Smart. But ties back to measurement. Locked gardens mean proprietary signals, murkier attribution. CTV’s step widens.
And creativity? AI scales it, fine. But humans lead—until costs force full bot takeover. Watch.
Wrapping the skepticism: AI drives quiet wins today. CTV chases tomorrow’s promise, hobbled by tech limits. Campanelli’s wake-up call lands amid hype. Listen up.
🧬 Related Insights
- Read more: Upfronts 2024: AI Hype Crashes Into Measurement Reality
- Read more: Omnicom’s AI Guardrails: Cure or Clever Upsell?
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ‘extra step’ in CTV performance measurement?
It’s the gap from TV screen exposure to user action—like a purchase elsewhere. Unlike mobile’s direct path, CTV relies on fuzzy cross-device tracking.
How does AI improve CTV audience targeting?
Tools like Horizon’s Blu use AI for precise audience builds, better optimizations in DSPs/SSPs, leading to stronger backend results.
Will CTV ever match mobile for performance ads?
Doubtful without measurement breakthroughs. Historical parallels to radio suggest branding dominance over direct response.
